Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (1200MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +124%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
2304
Shading Units
3328
192
TMUs
104
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
12 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy