NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 110% (1620MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+7%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+55%
3220
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+59%
1505
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
Quadro T2000 Max Q
+58%
463
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2304
Shading Units
1024
192
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
