Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 76% (1358MHz vs 771MHz)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
3.553 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +95%
6.953 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K5200
293
RTX A2000 Mobile +317%
1222
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

667 MHz
Base Clock
893 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
2304
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
95W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GA106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
12 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy