NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+245%
3.553 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
2304
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
