NVIDIA Quadro K5200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 67% (1291MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K5200
+19%
3.553 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro K5200
2072
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+1%
2096
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro K5200
941
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+83%
1723
Blender
Quadro K5200
+26%
293
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Feb 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
667 MHz
Base Clock
1291 MHz
771 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
2304
Shading Units
1152
192
TMUs
72
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
148.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
3.553 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
148.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
