Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +3191%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
350W
200 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy