Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro K600 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (41W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K600
0.336 TFLOPS
Quadro CX +37%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.504 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
336.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
14.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

41W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy