Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA GRID M3 3020

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1306MHz vs 902MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +210%
5.196 TFLOPS
GRID M3 3020
1.672 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2016
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
Unknown
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.7 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy