Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +2852%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2880
Shading Units
64
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
59W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G94
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy