Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
2832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +3991%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
2880
Shading Units
48
240
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G94
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy