Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +11709%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GT218
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
28W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy