Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 25% (1124MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +351%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
512
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GM107
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy