Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +808%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K6000 +583%
82
Quadro K2000M
12
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
384
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
GK107
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy