Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2864 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000 +17817%
5.196 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
2880
Shading Units
16
240
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
21W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
G86
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy