Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 88% (1700MHz vs 902MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K6000
5.196 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +335%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
902 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
6656
240
TMUs
416
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

54.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
216.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
5.196 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
1.732 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Aldebaran
GK110-890-B1
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy