Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

NVIDIA Quadro K620 vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 and 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 260W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1395MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
4224 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 16 +1390%
12.86 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1575 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
604.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
4608
24
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
26.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
401.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
25.71 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.86 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
401.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU102
GM107-850-A2
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy