Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1710MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
8832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
A10G +3552%
31.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K620M
82
A10G +4368%
3664
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
9216
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GA102
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
28.3 billion
Unknown
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy