Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K620M +1861%
0.863 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
8
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

30W
TDP
28W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GT218
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.26 billion
Unknown
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy