Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1710MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
8448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
A10G +1664%
31.52 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000
107
A10G +3324%
3664
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
9216
48
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA102
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy