NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID K500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GRID K500
+28%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
