NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

VS

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1163MHz vs 1124MHz)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

128 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages

Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro M2000 +24%

1.786 TFLOPS

Quadro K2200

1.439 TFLOPS

Blender

Quadro M2000

107

Quadro K2200 +13%

121

OctaneBench

Quadro M2000

27

Quadro K2200 +22%

33

Quadro M2000

VS

Quadro K2200

Graphics Card

Apr 2016

Release Date

Jul 2014

Quadro

Generation

Quadro

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz

Base Clock

1046 MHz

1163 MHz

Boost Clock

1124 MHz

1653 MHz

Memory Clock

1253 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR5

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

105.8GB/s

Bandwidth

80.19GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

768

Shading Units

640

48

TMUs

40

32

ROPs

16

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SMM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

17.98 GPixel/s

55.82 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

44.96 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

-

1.786 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1439 GFLOPS

55.82 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

44.96 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206

GPU Name

GM107

GM206-875-A1

GPU Variant

-

Maxwell 2.0

Architecture

Maxwell

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

28 nm

2.94 billion

Transistors

1.87 billion

228 mm²

Die Size

148 mm²

Board Design

75W

TDP

68W

250 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

4x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.2

CUDA

5.0

6.4

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

2

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

3

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

4

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

5

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P620

6

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

7

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

8

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 64 GB

9

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

10

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance