NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1178MHz vs 1163MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A
+170%
4.825 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
557 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2048
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GM204
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
