Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1747MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Mobile +400%
8.945 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1747 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
20
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
2560
48
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
111.8 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
279.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
139.8 GFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.945 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
279.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GP104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy