Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +272%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
192
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
62W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF106
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy