Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 239W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 SDI 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 SDI +190%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2880
48
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
239W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
3x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2 3x SDI
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK110
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy