Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +1016%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
64
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G92
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy