Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1163MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +27%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000
107
Quadro M2000M +27%
136
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000
27
Quadro M2000M +25%
34
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
1029 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GM107
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy