Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 80W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1215MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +701%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
510 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
46
768
Shading Units
5888
48
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
80W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy