Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1098MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +68%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1536
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy