Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1098MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +40%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M +25%
34
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy