Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +1798%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy