Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI210

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1700MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (64GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6016 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI210 +1510%
22.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Dec 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
64GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1638GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
104
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
6656
40
TMUs
416
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
707.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
181.0 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.63 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.63 TFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy