Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 20GB VRAM RTX A4500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 200W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 50% (1650MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (640.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 +1583%
23.65 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1050 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
640.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
7168
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
158.4 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
369.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.65 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.65 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
369.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
200W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy