NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+12%
2.419 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+49%
3019
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro T1000 Max Q
+35%
1279
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
765 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.20 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
75.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.838 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.419 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
75.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU117
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
