Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID K520

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA GRID K520

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
GRID K520 +6%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy