NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 143.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+109%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Dec 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
204W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF100
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
