NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+2587%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G84
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
