Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 24 GB +218%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
3072
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
285.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM200
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GM200-880-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy