NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 6GB VRAM RTX A3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1230MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A3000 Mobile
+368%
10.08 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX A3000 Mobile
+306%
8191
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX A3000 Mobile
+348%
4223
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1230 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
32
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.72 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.08 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.08 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
