Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Mobile +721%
17.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
5888
64
TMUs
184
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
276.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.66 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.66 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
276.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
140W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy