NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
9728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+1700%
38.71 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX A6000
+780%
17742
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX A6000
+890%
9324
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
1024
Shading Units
10752
64
TMUs
336
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA102
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
