Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 260W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +458%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
1664
Shading Units
4608
104
TMUs
288
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
260W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU102
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy