Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 36% (1530MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +1715%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
5120
16
TMUs
320
8
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GV100
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy