Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M500M
0.863 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050 +19%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.992 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
17.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
863.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
26.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GF100
N15M-Q3
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy