Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M520 Mobile
0.8 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +1636%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
384
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.328 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
16.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
799.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
24.98 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
Unknown
Transistors
54.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy