Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +9148%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G84
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy