Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 +565%
6.844 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
900W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1300 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy