Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 55W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1036MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Quadro M2200 Mobile +215%
2.122 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
695 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1036 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1377 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
88.13GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.15 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.30 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.122 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.30 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

30W
TDP
55W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy