Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (924MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000 SE +181%
1.892 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
823 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
924 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.57 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.892 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.14 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy