Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 230W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 107% (1815MHz vs 876MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +1556%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

837 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
384
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
230W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy